Taliban’s control of Afghanistan could mean fast Al-Qaeda resurgence
A former Trump administration official warned that the Taliban’s increasing control over Afghanistan amid the U.S. withdrawal could allow for a rapid Al-Qaeda resurgence, the Associated Press reported.
“I think Al-Qaeda has an opportunity, and they’re going to take advantage of that opportunity,” said Chris Costa, the senior director for counterterrorism for former President Donald Trump. “This is a galvanizing event for jihadists everywhere.”
Al-Qaeda, the group responsible for the terrorist attacks in America on September 11, 2001, has seen its presence reduced in Afghanistan throughout the 20-year war. While it is unclear whether the group currently has the ability to organize another attack, a June report from the U.N. Security Council found that Al-Qaeda senior leadership and hundreds of fighters are still in Afghanistan
The Taliban, which helped hide Al-Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan before September 11, remains “close” with the group “based on friendship, a history of shared struggle, ideological sympathy and intermarriage,” the report said.
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby acknowledged Friday that Al-Qaeda remains a presence in Afghanistan, though quantifying it is hard because of a reduced intelligence-gathering capability in the country and “because it’s not like they carry identification cards and register somewhere.”
Even inside the country, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban represent only two of the urgent terrorism concerns, as evidenced by unease about the potential for Islamic State militant group attacks against Americans in Afghanistan that over the weekend forced the U.S. military to develop new ways to get evacuees to the airport in Kabul. The Taliban and ISIS have fought each other in the past, but the worry now is that Afghanistan could again be a safe harbor for multiple extremists determined to attack the U.S. or other countries.
President Joe Biden has spoken repeatedly of what he calls an “over-the-horizon capability” that he says will enable the U.S. to keep track of terrorism threats from afar. His national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, told reporters Monday that Biden has been clear that counterterrorism capabilities have evolved to the point where the threat can be suppressed without a strong boots-on-the-ground presence. He said the intelligence community does not believe Al-Qaeda currently has the capability to attack the U.S.
The U.S. is also presumably anticipating that strengthened airport screening and more sophisticated surveillance can be more effective than 20 years ago in thwarting an attack. But experts worry that intelligence-gathering capabilities needed as an early-warning system against an attack will be negatively affected by the troop withdrawal.
An added complication is the sheer volume of pressing national security threats that dwarf what the U.S. government was confronting before the September 11 attacks. These include sophisticated cyber operations from China and Russia that can cripple critical infrastructure or pilfer sensitive secrets, nuclear ambitions in Iran and an ascendant domestic terrorism threat laid bare by the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
FBI Director Chris Wray has described that home-grown threat as “metastasizing,” with the number of arrests of white supremacists and racially motivated extremists nearly tripling since his first year on the job.
“My concern is that you can’t compare 2001 to today,” said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University. There’s a “much vaster and better organized bureaucracy,” he said, but it’s burdened with demands not specifically tied to terrorism.
Hoffman said that although he didn’t think Al-Qaeda would be able to quickly use Afghanistan as a launchpad for attacks against the U.S., it may re-establish “its coordinating function” in the region to work with and encourage strikes by its affiliates—a patient strategy that may yet be vindicated.
“Terrorist groups don’t conform to train timetables or flight schedules,” Hoffman said. “They do things when it suits them and, as Al-Qaeda was doing, they quietly lay the foundation in hopes that that foundation will eventually affect or determine their success.”
The concern is resonant enough that Biden administration officials told Congress last week that, based on the evolving situation, they now believe terror groups like Al-Qaeda may be able to grow much faster than expected. In June, the Pentagon’s top leaders said an extremist group like Al-Qaeda may be able to regenerate in Afghanistan and pose a threat to the U.S. homeland within two years of the American military’s withdrawal.
The September 11 attacks made Al-Qaeda the most internationally recognizable terror group, but in the past decade at least, the most potent threat inside the U.S. has come from individuals inspired by the Islamic State, resulting in deadly massacres like the ones in San Bernardino, California and Orlando.
But Al-Qaeda hardly disappeared. U.S. authorities alleged last year that a Saudi gunman who killed three U.S. sailors at a military base in Florida in 2019 had communicated with Al-Qaeda operatives about planning and tactics. Last December, the Justice Department charged a Kenyan man with trying to stage a 9/11-style attack on the U.S. on behalf of the terrorist organization al-Shabab, which is linked to Al-Qaeda.
Now it’s possible that other extremists will find themselves inspired by Al-Qaeda, even if not directed by it.
“Until recently, I would have said that the threat from Al-Qaeda core is pretty modest. They didn’t have safe haven in Afghanistan, their senior leadership was scattered,” said Nathan Sales, former coordinator for counterterrorism at the State Department.
But, now with the Taliban back in control, “all of that could change and could change very rapidly.”
Source: Newsweek
